Race and DiscriminationCherry Bomb -- Tuesday, August 04, 2009 -- 12:11:24 AM
A place to discuss all issues involving race.This thread is tagged: race, affirmative, preferences, racism
(All users will see what tags exist for a thread. Please tag carefully!)
Just read this Breitbart article today:
The problem for the White House was the more the esteemed professor talked, the more trouble he created for his friend, the president. The clever photo-op sans audio was crafted to yank the director of the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research off the stage, lest anyone begin to question what is being taught at Harvard these days.
Conversely, the more Sgt. Crowley weighed in, and his brave black co-workers spoke out, the more obvious it became that a national discussion featuring this cast of characters may not end with the results the professor and the president wanted.
But then Skip Gates was tired. What was President Barack Obama’s excuse? Why did he step into the same cultural narrative that Mr. Gates had tried and failed with?
Where race is concerned, I sometimes think of the president as the Peter Sellers character in “Dr. Strangelove.” Sellers plays a closet Nazi whose left arm—quite involuntarily—keeps springing up into the Heil Hitler salute. We see him in his wheelchair, his right arm—the good and decent arm—struggling to keep the Nazi arm down so that no one will know the truth of his inner life. These wrestling matches between the good and bad arms were hysterically funny.
When I saw Mr. Obama—with every escape route available to him—wade right into the Gates affair at the end of his health-care news conference, I knew that his demon arm had momentarily won out over his good arm. It broke completely free—into full salute—in the “acted stupidly” comment that he made in reference to the Cambridge police’s handling of the matter. Here was the implication that whites were such clumsy and incorrigible racists that even the most highly achieved blacks lived in constant peril of racial humiliation. This was a cultural narrative, a politics, and in the end it was a bigotry. It let white Americans see a president who doubted them
(Message has been moved to Why You Annoy Me--Emergency Backup Thread, originally posted by JL Finch on Wednesday, August 05, 2009 -- 04:39:50 PM.)
(Message has been moved to Why You Annoy Me--Emergency Backup Thread, originally posted by Kteemac on Wednesday, August 05, 2009 -- 05:01:29 PM.)
(Message has been moved to Why You Annoy Me--Emergency Backup Thread, originally posted by Pincher Martin on Wednesday, August 05, 2009 -- 07:29:42 PM.)
I think sometimes we get a bit American-centric on these issues.
This strikes me as, well, insane:
The county is drowning in debt (the county hospital lost $80 million last year), real estate taxes have risen dramatically, and there's talk of laying off police and firefighters. But we will have racial equality.
I don't know you well enough, Cliff, to know whether your final comment in the post above is flip or not.
I find it creepy that a county is being forced to zone for cheap housing and market that housing to poor minorities in cities, effectively moving urban blight out to the surburbs and allowing the federal government to keep score on whether localities are diverse enough.
They are going need a lot of luck with that. "Build it and they will come" is from a fantasy movie.
In Seattle, we have affordable housing spread all over the place, but we still have the Central District, and some people don't want to move out.
That said, I fully support that if we must have this kind of legislation that the many localities in California which are overwhelmingly white and liberal be forced to integrate first. From Marin county to the Monterey coast to Santa Barbara to Malibu, let's allow a little color into these dull white places. It seems only fair to have those localities which are constantly calling red America racist to lead the charge in this battle.
(I suspect, however, that when forced to do what they are happy to have the rest of us forced to do, that they will become far less enthusiastic about their social engineering and much more sensitive to the possible unintended consequences of their proposals.)
That's what I was going to point out--it's those ultra-white enclaves that vote so vehemently for Dems. Let them taste some of the results of their efforts.
In reality, though, I expect more white flight--possibly back into the cities.
Rock legend Bob Dylan was treated like a complete unknown by police in a New Jersey shore community when a resident called to report someone wandering around the neighborhood.
Dylan was in Long Branch, about a two-hour drive south of New York City, on July 23 as part of a tour with Willie Nelson and John Mellencamp that was to play at a baseball stadium in nearby Lakewood.
A 24-year-old police officer apparently was unaware of who Dylan is and asked him for identification, Long Branch business administrator Howard Woolley said Friday.
"I don't think she was familiar with his entire body of work," Woolley said.
The incident began at 5 p.m. when a resident said a man was wandering around a low-income, predominantly minority neighborhood several blocks from the oceanfront looking at houses.
The police officer drove up to Dylan, who was wearing a blue jacket, and asked him his name. According to Woolley, the following exchange ensued:
"What is your name, sir?" the officer asked.
"Bob Dylan," Dylan said.
"OK, what are you doing here?" the officer asked.
"I'm on tour," the singer replied.
A second officer, also in his 20s, responded to assist the first officer. He, too, apparently was unfamiliar with Dylan, Woolley said.
The officers asked Dylan for identification. The singer of such classics as "Like a Rolling Stone" and "Blowin' in the Wind" said that he didn't have any ID with him, that he was just walking around looking at houses to pass some time before that night's show.
The officers asked Dylan, 68, to accompany them back to the Ocean Place Resort and Spa, where the performers were staying. Once there, tour staff vouched for Dylan.
The officers thanked him for his cooperation.
"He couldn't have been any nicer to them," Woolley added.
The cops were racial profiling: white guy, low income neighborhood, must be buying crack.
But then, as Steve Sailer said, it's not as if Dylan's someone super famous like, say, Skip Gates.
Oh, I think it was totally normal to look twice. Hell, Bob Dylan usually looks much scaggier than that. But would he have been given the once over if he'd been looking like that and black in the same neighborhood? Probably not.
I didn't mean to imply that he shouldn't have been questioned. The irony was a) that the cops had never heard of him and b) an incredibly famous white man complied cheerfully when he was questioned by the cops, rather than go nuts at the clear implication that he was in the wrong place for his skin color.